Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Imperialism, Part 1 

Your Homework for this week....

 1.  Read the two short book sections posted on Blackboard (one from Mandela’s autobiography; one from Gandhi’s autobiography)
2.  You have 2 choices for the second part of your homework:  Attend the Invisible Children film screening and talk-back on Monday, Oct. 1 (7 pm, Lindsay Auditorium), OR read the following articles and watch the following interview:

http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/03/the-soft-bigotry-of-kony-2012/254194/
http://sayhelloafrica.com/post/18893492141/kony-2012-why-i-love-the-idea-but-hate-the-campaign **read through some of the comments on this one, too!


 **There is an ongoing debate, especially within development/humanitarian circles, about whether certain Western approaches to issues in developing countries are inherently imperialist. Invisible Children has been put at the center of this debate in a pretty public way this year with the KONY2012 campaign. Please note that I’m not saying that Invisible Children is an imperialist organization, but rather asking you to look directly at this issue (and the debate surrounding it) with a critical eye.

Sunday, September 23, 2012

Staging Race and Bearing Witness

Segregated buses in Alabama, ca. 1940-1956:
Scenes from the 1956 Montgomery Bus Boycott:


Rosa Parks rides a Montgomery bus integrated as a result of the boycott (1956):
Scene from Southland (1951/2012):
Clint Eastwood speech at the GOP National Convention (2012):


From Ronald Reagan's speech to the American Business Conference (1985):

From the Clint Eastwood film Sudden Impact (1983), the fourth film in the Dirty Harry series:

From Dirty Harry (1971): 


A 9.21.2012 story on News People Need, titled "Recent Empty Chair 'Hangings' Suggest Anti-Obama Protest Gone to Extreme."

Thursday, September 20, 2012

The Montgomery Bus Boycott



For Tuesday, please read the chapter titled “The Montgomery Bus Boycott,” from Taylor Branch’s Parting the Waters: America During the King Years, 1954–63; and then, by the start of Tuesday’s class, please post to our discussion board a 250–300-word response to the following:
You are likely familiar with the Montgomery Bus Boycott, the protest action against racial segregation that began when African American Civil Rights activist Rosa Parks refused to give up her bus seat to a white passenger. The Boycott was not only a successful protest campaign in its own right; it quickly became a potent and enduring symbol of the quest for social justice nationally and globally, inaugurating the Civil Rights Movement in America and inspiring similar mass movements around the world. What, in your opinion, is the secret of the Boycott’s social and symbolic power? That is, why, do you believe, did the Boycott succeed in striking such a powerful blow against the injustice of segregation? And why has it also succeeded so well in embodying the idea of social justice more broadly?
The Branch chapter is on Blackboard, in the Content folder. Please note that it’s in two parts (i.e., two PDF files). The chapter focuses on the Boycott itself, not on the episode involving Rosa Parks that sparked it. If you'd like to learn more about Rosa Parks's act of protest, you can read this story from the LA Times

Monday, September 10, 2012

Welcome to SJUS 2010!

Here's the slideshow we saw in class:



And here's the "quiz:"

Are You Practicing Social Justice

Southland assignment

Julie Belafonte, in an early 1950s
production of
Southland.
As we discussed in class, art-making can be a particularly powerful form of social justice activism for many reasons. For example, art can express histories that might otherwise be neglected, distorted, or altogether erased by the "official" historical narrative, which privileges the perspectives and interests of those in power. What's more, the arts are uniquely well equipped not only to preserve the past, but to bring it to bear upon the present, or even to help us imagine new and different futures. 
With this in mind, how do you interpret the historical significance of the production of Katherine Dunham's Southland, performed by the Cleo Parker Robinson Dance Ensemble? What neglected, distorted, or erased histories does it bring back into view? How does this production speak to our present moment? What alternative visions of the future does it challenge us to imagine?

By the start of class on Tuesday the 18th, please post a 250-300-word response to any or all of the questions above on our class discussion board. And please feel free -- indeed, encouraged! -- to engage with your classmates' posts.
(By the way, you might want to check out the article about Southland that appeared in the Denver Post the other day.)